Volume 19, Issue 4 (12-2024)
J. Mon. Ec. 2024, 19(4): 497-537 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohseni R, Ghasemi Meymandi M. NAFTA to USMCA free trade agreements: A comparative study about trade deficit & net trade of HS6 digit commodities in the agricultural section. J. Mon. Ec. 2024; 19 (4) : 4
URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-691-en.html
URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-691-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Member of Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science
2- MA
2- MA
Abstract: (980 Views)
This study examines the impact of NAFTA and USMCA free trade agreements on trade deficits and net agricultural trade between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, focusing on HS6-digit level agricultural commodities from 1994 to 2020. Using ARDL and gravity models, the results show that NAFTA led to increased trade volumes and improved net trade positions—particularly for Mexico, whose net agricultural trade surplus with the U.S. grew by approximately 24%. In contrast, the United States experienced a 15% increase in its agricultural trade deficit under USMCA, while Canada’s balance remained relatively stable, with fluctuations within a ±5% range. The ARDL model indicates that GDP (β = 0.47, p < 0.01), exchange rate (β = 0.82, p < 0.05), and government spending (β = –0.39, p < 0.1) significantly influenced bilateral trade deficits. In the gravity model, GDP per capita had the strongest positive effect on net agricultural trade (β = 1.75, p < 0.01), while agricultural value-added had a negative impact (β = –0.61, p < 0.05). These findings suggest that structural changes in trade agreements, combined with macroeconomic conditions, have measurable effects on national trade balances. For countries like Iran, the study highlights the importance of designing bilateral trade frameworks that promote agricultural competitiveness, maintain exchange rate stability, and protect vulnerable producers. Evidence-based trade policy can help Iran achieve greater trade resilience and improve its position in regional agricultural markets.
Article number: 4
Keywords: NAFTA to USMCA free trade agreements: A comparative study about trade deficit &, net trade of HS6 digit commodities in the agricultural section
Type of Study: Original Research - Empirical |
Subject:
Development Economics
Received: 21 Apr 2025 | Accepted: 20 Jul 2025 | Published: 6 Aug 2025
Received: 21 Apr 2025 | Accepted: 20 Jul 2025 | Published: 6 Aug 2025
References
1. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American economic review, 69(1), 106-116.
2. Batra, A. (2006). India's global trade potential: The gravity model approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327-361. [DOI:10.1080/12265080600888090]
3. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., and Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163. [DOI:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1975.tb01532.x]
4. Burfisher, M. E., Lambert, F., and Matheson, M. T. D. (2019). NAFTA to USMCA: What is Gained? International Monetary Fund. [DOI:10.5089/9781498303286.001]
5. Cameron, R. A., and Loukine, K. (2001). Canada-European :union: trade and investment relations: The impact of tariff elimination. Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, European Branch.
6. Campi, M., and Dueñas, M. (2019). Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade. Research Policy, 48(3), 531-545. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.011]
7. Cheong, J., and Tang, K. K. (2015). Heterogeneous effects of preferential trade agreements: How does partner similarity matter? World Development, 66, 222-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.021]
8. Cooper, W. H. (2011). Free trade agreements: impact on US trade and implications for US trade policy. DIANE Publishing.
9. Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276. [DOI:10.2307/1913236]
10. García, N. L. (2018). The current situation on the international honey market. Bee World, 95(3), 89-94. [DOI:10.1080/0005772X.2018.1483814]
11. Galkin, P., Bollino, C. A., and Atalla, T. (2018). Effect of preferential trade agreements on China's energy trade from Chinese and exporters' perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(6), 1776-1797. [DOI:10.1108/IJoEM-06-2017-0212]
12. Gil-Pareja, S., Llorca-Vivero, R., and Martínez-Serrano, J. A. (2014). Do nonreciprocal preferential trade agreements increase beneficiaries' exports? Journal of development economics, 107, 291-304. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.01.002]
13. Halicioglu, F. (2008). The bilateral J-curve: Turkey versus her 13 trading partners. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(3), 236-243. [DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2008.02.006]
14. Hanif, S., Fatima, S. N., shahid Iqbal, M., Hanif, S., & Batool, S. (2023). Trade Balance and Pakistan Economy using ARDL model: A Perspective of Trade Deficit Developing Economies. Journal of Economics, 5(4), 1162-1173. [DOI:10.52131/joe.2023.0504.0186]
15. Harris, R., and Sollis, R. (2003). Applied time series modelling and forecasting. Wiley.
16. Isard, W. (1954). Location theory and trade theory: short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 305-320. [DOI:10.2307/1884452]
17. Keum, K. (2010). Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 541-557. [DOI:10.1007/s00168-008-0275-2]
18. Koo, W. W., Karemera, D., and Taylor, R. (1994). A gravity model analysis of meat trade policies. Agricultural Economics, 10(1), 81-88. [DOI:10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00291.x]
19. Leitão, N. C. (2024). Gravity model and international trade: A survey of the literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 219. [DOI:10.3390/admsci14090219]
20. Levy, P. I. (1997). A political-economic analysis of free-trade agreements. The American Economic Review, 506-519.
21. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., and Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7]
22. Manole, V. (2005). WITS-World Integrated Trade Solution. World Scientific Book Chapters, 541-548. [DOI:10.1142/9789812701350_0020]
23. Masood, A., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2024). Trade effects of trade facilitation revisited. Economics Letters, 234, 111477. [DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111477]
24. Mátyás, L. (1998). The gravity model: Some econometric considerations. World Economy, 21(3), 397-401. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9701.00136]
25. Nordgren, K. L. (2000). GATT BISD (Basic Instruments and Selected Documents)-Bernan Press/World Trade Organization, 1998. 1 CD-ROM, 1 p. Bernan/WTO Licensing Agreement, and 1 p. Installation Guide. Distributed by Bernan Press. ISBN: 0-89059-101-6. $500.00. Journal of Government Information, 27(4), 525-526. [DOI:10.1016/S1352-0237(00)00198-2]
26. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. [DOI:10.1002/jae.616]
27. Rahman, M. M. (2003). A panel data analysis of Bangladesh's trade: the gravity model approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group (ETSG2003). European Trade Study Group.
28. Ramos-Herrera, M. D. C. (2024). Economic growth and deviations from the equilibrium exchange rate: a panel ARDL and panel NARDL approach. Applied Economic Analysis, 33(98), 118-139. [DOI:10.1108/AEA-02-2024-0065]
29. Rechenberg, A. (2025). Free Trade Agreements Have Damaged U.S. Agricultural Trade Performance. Coalition For a Prosperous America. https://prosperousamerica.org/free-trade-agreements-have-damaged-u-s-agricultural-trade-performance
30. Rosen, H. (2004). Free trade agreements as foreign policy tools: The US-Israel and US-Jordan FTAs. Free trade agreements: US strategies and priorities, 51, 77.
31. Rozanski, J., Kuwahara, H., and Amjadi, A. (2001). GTAP 5 Data Base Documentation-Chapter 16. B: Sources of Merchandise Tariff Data.
32. Schott, J. J. (Ed.). (2004). Free trade agreements: US strategies and priorities. Columbia University Press.
33. Thangavelu, S. M., and Findlay, C. (2011). The impact of free trade agreements on foreign direct investment in the Asia-Pacific region. ASEAN, 1, 2010-29.
34. Tinbergen, J. (1979). Recollections of professional experiences. PSL Quarterly Review, 32(131).
35. Trott, L. A., McKinnon, A. D., Alongi, D. M., Davidson, A., and Burford, M. A. (2004). Carbon and nitrogen processes in a mangrove creek receiving shrimp farm effluent. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 59(2), 197-207. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2003.08.008]
36. United States International Trade Commission, and United States. Office of the US Trade Representative. (1992). Potential Effects of a North American Free Trade Agreement on Apparel Investment in CBERA Countries: Report to the United States Trade Representative on Investigation No. 332-321 (Vol. 2541). US International Trade Commission.
37. United States International Trade Commission. (1999). Assessment of the Economic Effects on the United States of China's Accession to the WTO. US International Trade Commission.
38. Urata, S., and Sasuya, J. (2007). An Analysis of the Restrictions on Foreign Direct Investment in Free Trade Agreements. Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
39. Villarreal, A. M., and Fergusson, I. F. (2020). NAFTA and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Congressional Research Service Report.
40. Wahyudi, S. T., and Sari, S. (2020). The Relationship Between Exchange Rate and Trade Balances: An Empirical Study on Indonesia. In 23rd Asian Forum of Business Education (AFBE 2019) (pp. 217-221). Atlantis Press. [DOI:10.2991/aebmr.k.200606.036]
41. Westerlund, J., and Wilhelmsson, F. (2011). Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics, 43(6), 641-649. [DOI:10.1080/00036840802599784]
42. Zahid, H., Bashir, M. F., and Tahir, M. (2021). Relationship between Preferential Trade Agreements and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from a Panel of 147 Countries. The International Trade Journal, 35(6), 523-539. [DOI:10.1080/08853908.2020.1771230]
43. Zhang, M., Zhang, S., Lee, C. C., and Zhou, D. (2021). Effects of trade openness on renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: New insights from panel smooth transition regression modelling. Energy Economics, 104, 105649. [DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105649]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
