Volume 19, Issue 3 (9-2024)
J. Mon. Ec. 2024, 19(3): 413-429 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
behzadi soufiani M. Does Trade Volume Really Affect Market Capitalization in Iran?. J. Mon. Ec. 2024; 19 (3) : 6
URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-696-en.html
URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-696-en.html
university of Tehran
Abstract: (909 Views)
Regarding high persistent inflation in Iran, there is a serious concern which macroeconomic variables more accurately exchange rate and interest rate are the leading determinants of market capitalization in Iran. This assumption ignores some crucial factors dealing with investors expectations such as value of trade volume and takes inflationary expectation as the dominant one which is controlling all other aspects. In order to test whether trade volume representing reactions of investors to whole dynamics of market could affect the aggregate capital market, market capitalization or not, paper follows two logics. First, it would take market capitalization both in domestic currency and US dollar to exclude inflationary impact and second it would use ARDL model to have the estimates in two time-horizons, short run and long run. Results indicate that value of trade volume is a significant determinant of market capitalization. Interest rate could not explain the long run dynamics and could just carry short tun influence. Exchange rate growth along with trade volume are leading factors of market capitalization in Iranian Rial, while this holds true for Dollar capitalization as well. Ultimately, also macroeconomic factors are vividly prominent to postulate the impacts, value of trade volume is also important in every matter to shape the market aggregate value.
Article number: 6
Type of Study: Original Research - Empirical |
Subject:
Economics
Received: 3 May 2025 | Accepted: 1 Jun 2025 | Published: 1 Jul 2025
Received: 3 May 2025 | Accepted: 1 Jun 2025 | Published: 1 Jul 2025
References
1. Abbas, D. S., Zulaecha, H. E., Rachmania, D., Hakim, M. Z., & Rachmi, D. A. (2022). Analysis of determinant factors in influencing stock return: Panel data analysis approach. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 2(5), 645-655. [DOI:10.35877/454RI.daengku1205]
2. Abbasi, E. , Dehghan nayeri, L. and Poordadash Mehrabani, N. (2016). Surveying the Relation among Volume, Stock Return and Return Volatility in the Tehran Stock Exchange: A Wavelet Analysis. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 4(4), 99-114. doi: 10.22108/amf.2016.21115
3. Aboualhasan, H. S., Alali, M. S., Alaskar, I. T., & Alsaifi, K. The Volume-return Relationship: Do crises influence their rise and fall?.
4. Assogbavi, T., & Osagi, J.E. (2006). Equity Valuation Process and PriceVolume Relationship on Emerging Stock Markets, International Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(9), 7-18. [DOI:10.19030/iber.v5i9.3501]
5. Bouattour, M., & Miloudi, A. (2024). Another look at the asymmetric relationship between stock returns and trading volume: evidence from the Markov-switching model. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(2), 256-279. [DOI:10.1108/RAF-02-2023-0045]
6. Chen, S. W., & Liu, T. C. (2015). On Asymmetric Causality Between Stock Prices and Trading Volume for Some Developed and Emerging Stock Markets: A Preliminary Analysis. International Review of Accounting, Banking & Finance, 7(1).
7. Choi, S. Y. (2021). Analysis of stock market efficiency during crisis periods in the US stock market: Differences between the global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 574, 125988. [DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2021.125988]
8. Chuang, C. C., Kuan, C. M., & Lin, H. Y. (2009). Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return-volume relations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1351-1360. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.013]
9. Çıralı, S. (2022). A comparison of international market indices for measuring market efficiency based on price-volume relationship. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 6(1), 90-105. [DOI:10.1108/JCMS-11-2021-0037]
10. Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 251-276. [DOI:10.2307/1913236]
11. Eslami Bidgoli, S., & Shaabanpour Fard, P. (2016). The relationship between trading volume and its components and returns; a case study in the Tehran Stock Exchange focusing on intraday trading and eliminating the U-shaped effect.. Financial Management Perspective, 6(14), 45-63.
12. Finans, F. (2016). Beta Katsayilarindaki Değişimin Açiklanmasinda İşlem Hacminin Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Banka Hisselerine Dayali Bir Analiz.
13. Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., & Stanley, H. E. (2007). A theory of limited liquidity and large investors causing spikes in stock market volatility and trading volume. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 564-573. [DOI:10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.564]
14. Gul, F., & Javed, T. (2009). Relationship between trading volume and stock exchange performance: A case from Karachi stock exchange. International business & economics research journal (IBER), 8(8). [DOI:10.19030/iber.v8i8.3155]
15. Habib, N. M. (2011). Trade volume and returns in emerging stock markets an empirical study: The Egyptian market. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19), 302-312.
16. Jin, J., Zhang, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Decoding High-Volume Stock Momentum: Disagreement or Disposition?. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 1-31. [DOI:10.1080/15427560.2024.2441703]
17. Jiranyakul, K. (2015). Temporal causal relationship between stock market capitalization, trade openness and real GDP: evidence from Thailand. Jiranyakul, K.,(2015)," Temporal Causal Relationship between Stock Market Capitalization, Trade Openness and Real GDP: Evidence from Thailand," International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(4), 1525-1534. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2518354]
18. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press on Demand. [DOI:10.1093/0198774508.001.0001]
19. Kadel, D. R., & Patodiya, P. K. (2023). Dynamic Relationship of the Stock Index with the Trading Volume of the Nepal Stock Exchange: An Empirical Analysis. Shanti Journal, 3(1-2), 47-64. [DOI:10.3126/shantij.v3i1-2.60799]
20. Kalantari, A., & Khalil Pak Tinat, N. (2014). Examining the Effect of Trading Volume on the Total Index of Tehran Stock Exchange in boom and bust Periods: Application of Markov Regime Transition Model. Iranian economic research. 19(58), 183-204. [In Persian]
21. Kashi, M., Roshan, R., & Donyaei, M. (2014). Investigate The Causal and Contemporaneous Relations of Stock Returns, Trading Volume and Tehran Stock Exchange Return Volatility: Application of Var-GrjGarch and Grj-Garchdcc Multivariate Models. Financial Engineering and Protfolio Management, 17(4), 61-86. https://www.sid.ir/paper/197766/en. [In Persian]
22. Khajavi, sh., ghasemi, M., & Alhari Abhari, H. (2009). Examining the relationships between stock returns, return change, and trading volume in the Tehran Stock Exchange using ARCH and GARCH models. Journal of Accounting Advances, 1(1), 25-68. doi: 10.22099/jaa.2009.3442. [In Persian]
23. Laffont, J. J., & Maskin, E. S. (1990). The efficient market hypothesis and insider trading on the stock market. Journal of Political Economy, 98(1), 70-93. [DOI:10.1086/261669]
24. Lee, D. H., Kim, M. K., & Kim, T. S. (2016). Abnormal trading volume and the cross-section of stock returns. KAIST College of Business Working Paper Series, (2016-008). [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2812010]
25. Lin, H. Y. (2013). Dynamic stock return-volume relation: Evidence from emerging Asian markets. Bulletin of economic research, 65(2), 178-193. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00428.x]
26. Lof, M., & van Bommel, J. (2023). Asymmetric information and the distribution of trading volume. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102464. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102464]
27. Mallikarjunappa, T., Saldanha, D., & Hawaldar, I. T. (2024). The dynamics of the relationship between stock returns and trading volumes: An emerging markets perspective during varying market conditions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100202. [DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100202]
28. Moreira Antônio, R., Rathke, A. A. T., Moraes, M. B. da C., & Ambrozini, M. A. (2018). Efeito do Volume de Negócios nas Escolhas de Recomendações de Ações dos Analistas. Brazilian Review of Finance, 15(2), 287-311. [DOI:10.12660/rbfin.v15n2.2017.67390]
29. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for china: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied economics, 37(17):1979-1990. [DOI:10.1080/00036840500278103]
30. Nurhayati, I. (2022). The effect of trading volume, frequency and market capitalization on stock return of chemical sub sector. Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik), 13(2), 283-296. [DOI:10.32832/jm-uika.v13i2.7247]
31. Perron, P. and Ng, S. (1996). Useful modifications to some unit root tests with dependent errors and their local asymptotic properties. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(3):435-463. [DOI:10.2307/2297890]
32. Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31:371-413. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139052221.011]
33. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3):289-326. [DOI:10.1002/jae.616]
34. Pham, M. C. (2018). Modeling Returns, Volatility, Volume, and Trade Durations using High Frequency Data (Doctoral dissertation, Monash University).
35. Shahrazi, Mi., & Shahrazi, Me. (2023). Application of econophysics in examining the relationship between stock returns and trading volume in Tehran Stock Exchange. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Quantitative Economics. [DOI:10.22055/jqe.2023.42398.2529. [In Persian]]
36. Shrestha, S. R. (2018). Stock Return and Trading Volume Relation in Nepalese Stock Market: An ARDL Approach. Journal of Poverty, Investment, and Development, 46, 47-56.
37. Sierimo, C. (2002). Testing the efficient market hypothesis of the Helsinki stock exchange: Further empirical evidence based on nonlinear models (Doctoral dissertation, Helsingin yliopisto).
38. Sun, W. (2003). Relationship between trading volume and security prices and returns. Area Exam Report, Technical Report, MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems.
39. Troster, V., Marques, A. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). New Insights on the Trading Volume-Return Relationship: Evidence from the Three Largest Stock Exchanges. Economic Growth and Financial Development: Effects of Capital Flight in Emerging Economies, 179-204. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-79003-5_10]
40. Wu, H. M., & Guo, W. C. (2004). Asset price volatility and trading volume with rational beliefs. Economic Theory, 23(4), 795-829. [DOI:10.1007/s00199-003-0397-9]
41. Xu, X. E., Chen, P., & Wu, C. (2006). Time and dynamic volume-volatility relation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(5), 1535-1558. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.011]
42. Zeren, F., & Konuk, F. (2016). The Nexus between Trading Volume and Stock Prices: Panel Evidence from OECD Countries. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 21. [DOI:10.20409/berj.2016116802]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
