Volume 20, Issue 1 (3-2025)                   J. Mon. Ec. 2025, 20(1): 25-37 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahdavi G, Asghari Z, souri A. Insurance Pricing Using Frequency-Severity Models: A Comprehensive Approach. J. Mon. Ec. 2025; 20 (1) :25-37
URL: http://jme.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-708-en.html
1- Allameh Tabataba'i University
2- Associate prof., faculty of economics, Tehran university
Abstract:   (436 Views)

This paper investigates insurance pricing using frequency-severity models, focusing on the Potential Deviation Ratio (PDR) as a key measure in premium determination. The objective is to develop an accurate and actuarially sound pricing approach by modeling claim frequency and severity using appropriate statistical distributions. Specifically, we propose that the product of two fitted distributions—one for frequency and the other for severity—can be used to calculate the pure premium.

The methodology includes fitting various distributions to frequency and severity data from a major Iranian insurance company. To model the dependency structure, we employ the Clayton copula. This dependency structure is used when calculating pure premium by multiplying frequency and severity samples based on the fitted distributions. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, and Chi-Squared tests are applied to evaluate model performance.

The results demonstrate that using the pure premium, based on their respective fitted distributions, significantly enhances the accuracy of the model. This approach leads to more precise risk classification, improved premium setting, and ultimately, fairer pricing strategies. Additionally, the findings indicate that incorporating dependency structures between frequency and severity not only improves risk assessment but also contributes to greater financial stability for insurers.

Full-Text [PDF 906 kb]   (66 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research - Case Study | Subject: Economics
Received: 2 Jul 2025 | Accepted: 15 Sep 2025 | Published: 5 Oct 2025

References
1. Boucher, J.-P., Denuit, M., & Guillén, M. (2007). Risk classification for claim counts: A comparative analysis of various zero-inflated mixed Poisson and hurdle models. North American Actuarial Journal, 11(4), 110-131. [DOI:10.1080/10920277.2007.10597487]
2. Czado, C., Kastenmeier, R., Brechmann, E. C., & Min, A. (2012). A mixed copula model for insurance claims and claim sizes. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2012(4), 278-305. [DOI:10.1080/03461238.2010.546147]
3. De Jong, P., & Heller, G. Z. (2008). Generalized linear models for insurance data. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511755408]
4. Erhardt, V., & Czado, C. (2012). Modeling dependent yearly claim totals including zero claims in private health insurance. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2012(2), 106-129. [DOI:10.1080/03461238.2010.489762]
5. Frees, E. W., Gao, J., & Rosenberg, M. A. (2011). Predicting the frequency and amount of health care expenditures. North American Actuarial Journal, 15(3), 377-392. [DOI:10.1080/10920277.2011.10597626]
6. Frees, E. W. (2014). Frequency and severity models. In E. W. Frees, G. Meyers, & R. A. Derrig (Eds.), Predictive modeling applications in actuarial science, 1. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139342674]
7. Gschlößl, S., & Czado, C. (2007). Spatial modelling of claim frequency and claim size in non-life insurance. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2007(3), 202-225. [DOI:10.1080/03461230701414764]
8. Jørgensen, B., & Paes De Souza, M. C. (1994). Fitting Tweedie's compound poisson model to insurance claims data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1994(1), 69-93. [DOI:10.1080/03461238.1994.10413930]
9. Krämer, N., Brechmann, E. C., Silvestrini, D., & Czado, C. (2013). Total loss estimation using copula-based regression models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53(3), 829-839. [DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.09.003]
10. Lee, G. Y., & Shi, P. (2019). A dependent frequency-severity approach to modeling longitudinal insurance claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 87, 115-129. [DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.04.004]
11. Shirkavand, S., Mahdavi Kalishami, G. H., & Pazoki, N. (2019). Insurance products ratemaking and insurance company financial solvency ratio calculation via potential deviation ratio method. Financial Research Journal, 21(2), 165-186. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22059/frj.2019.270699.1006769]
12. Shi, P., Feng, X., & Ivantsova, A. (2015). Dependent frequency-severity modeling of insurance claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64, 417-428. [DOI:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.07.006]
13. Shi, P. (2014). Fat-tailed regression models. In E. W. Frees, R. A. Derrig, & G. Meyers (Eds.), Predictive modeling applications in actuarial science (pp. 236-259). Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139342674.010]
14. Werner, G., & Modlin, C. (2010). Basic ratemaking. In Casualty Actuarial Society (4th ed.).
15. Wuthrich, M. V. (2024). Non-life insurance: mathematics & statistics. Available at SSRN 2319328.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Money And Economy

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb